Pay Equity Syria

Click here for the country overview.

Basic Summary

Syria does not impose dedicated pay equity reporting or gender pay gap disclosure obligations on private employers. Equal pay and non-discrimination principles are grounded in general labor and constitutional provisions, with enforcement through the Ministry of Social Affairs and Labour and the labor courts. In practice, Total Rewards professionals rely on internal analyses aligned to international best practice to identify and remediate unjustified pay differences.

Persistent inflation, exchange control considerations, and complex payroll elements (allowances, overtime, in-kind benefits) make accurate, comparable compensation calculations critical. Organizations typically standardize to an annualized total compensation basis, normalize for full‑time equivalency, and use structured comparison groups and regression-based testing to isolate unexplained gaps.

Summary

Private-sector employers in Syria operate under Labour Law No. 17 of 2010 (as amended) and related executive regulations, which set wage, hours, and record-keeping obligations. While these instruments prohibit unlawful differential treatment, they do not prescribe a formal pay equity calculation method, thresholds, or a mandated reporting template. Public-sector pay is governed by the Civil Service framework and salary decrees. There is no statutory requirement to publish pay gap metrics or to submit pay equity reports to government authorities, though employers must provide payroll records upon inspection and comply with orders to rectify wage violations and pay arrears.

A robust internal pay equity program in Syria therefore centers on data standardization in a high-inflation, multi-allowance context; precise FTE normalization; comprehensive total compensation valuation (including in-kind benefits and equity, where applicable); formation of valid comparison groups by job, grade, and location; and the application of statistical tests (e.g., regression with appropriate controls). Common remediation practices include range alignment, out-of-cycle adjustments, and documentation of justifiable differentials (tenure, performance, qualifications) with contemporaneous evidence. Timelines are set internally, with consideration for payroll cycles, approvals, and any collective bargaining commitments.

Legal Framework

• Primary domestic instruments
  • Labour Law No. 17 of 2010 (private sector): Governs individual employment relationships, wages, working time, overtime, leave, terminations, and labor inspection. It establishes the right to remuneration and sets the framework for wage-related disputes and enforcement. Executive regulations and ministerial circulars supplement the law.
  • Civil Service Law and salary decrees (public sector): Civil service legislation and periodic decrees establish public-sector pay scales and benefits. Although not directly applicable to private employers, public pay principles inform market practices in certain industries.
  • Constitution of the Syrian Arab Republic (2012): Guarantees equality of citizens in rights and duties and prohibits discrimination, forming a constitutional backdrop against unlawful pay discrimination.

• Regulatory bodies and enforcement
  • Ministry of Social Affairs and Labour (MoSAL): Policy-making and oversight; labor inspectorate conducts inspections, reviews payroll and employment records, and may issue administrative orders.
  • Labor Courts / competent civil courts: Adjudicate wage disputes, claims for unpaid differences, and unlawful discrimination claims arising under the Labour Law.
  • Public prosecutors (in limited cases): May be involved where noncompliance amounts to criminal violations set out in labor or penal legislation.

• Penalties and remedies for non-compliance
  • Administrative orders to rectify violations and pay owed wages and differences.
  • Monetary fines as specified under the Labour Law and subsequent regulations for wage and record-keeping violations; amounts may be revised periodically.
  • Potential suspension of operations for severe or repeated violations; reputational and contractual consequences.
  • Civil liability including back pay, damages, and interest as awarded by courts.

• International frameworks and soft law
  • International Labour Organization (ILO) instruments provide the benchmark on equal remuneration and non-discrimination, including Convention No. 100 (Equal Remuneration) and Convention No. 111 (Discrimination in Employment and Occupation). Many multinational employers align internal policies to these standards regardless of local ratification status.
  • UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) and International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) articulate principles of non-discrimination and equal pay for work of equal value.
  • UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) and the UN Global Compact (Principle 6) guide corporate due diligence on non-discrimination in pay.

• Recent developments and practice notes
  • Periodic government decrees adjust minimum wage and allowances; these changes indirectly affect pay equity baselines through compression at the lower end of pay ranges.
  • No official Syrian pay transparency bill or mandated gender pay gap reporting has been promulgated as of August 2025.
  • Exchange control and sanctions contexts affect cross-border payroll, valuation of foreign currency components, and equity awards administration.

Detailed Data Requirements

Field/Data	Description
Employee unique identifier	Stable, anonymized internal ID used across HRIS, payroll, and talent systems; avoid national ID in analytic extracts to reduce sensitivity.
Legal entity and employer type	Name of Syrian employing entity or foreign employer-of-record; identifies whether Labour Law or other frameworks apply.
Work location	Country = SYR; governorate/city; site or remote designation; used for geographic differential controls and hazard allowances, if any.
Employment status and contract type	Permanent, fixed-term, temporary, apprentice/intern; full-time/part-time; independent contractor flag (excluded from employee analysis).
Job title (local)	Local title as reflected in contract/payroll.
Global job family/function	Harmonized family/function for cross-country comparisons (e.g., Finance, Engineering, Sales).
Job level/grade/band	Internal leveling (points, bands, grades); required for comparison group formation.
FLSA-like exemption status	Not a Syrian concept, but record exempt/non-exempt or overtime-eligible per contract and law to handle overtime calculations.
Managerial status	People manager vs. individual contributor for modeling controls.
Hire date and service date	Original hire and continuous service dates for tenure calculations.
Work schedule	Contracted weekly hours; shift pattern (day/night/rotational) for premium pay calculation.
Base pay rate	Contractual base (hourly/daily/monthly). Indicate currency (typically SYP) and pay frequency.
Guaranteed allowances	Transport, meal, housing, cost-of-living, family/children, hardship/hazard, site allowance; capture each allowance as a separate field, indicate whether pensionable.
Variable pay eligibility	Eligibility flags for sales incentives, bonuses, commission; target and actual awards with performance period.
Overtime hours and premiums	Regular, night, rest day, public holiday overtime hours and rates/premiums; reflect legal or contractual multipliers.
Shift differentials and premium pay	Additional pay for night/holiday shifts separate from overtime, if applicable.
Equity compensation	Grant type (RSU/option/PSU), grant date, grant fair value, vesting schedule, currency; local tax/withholding feasibility notes in sanctions/FX context.
In-kind benefits and perquisites	Employer cost or imputed fair value of benefits (transport, meals, accommodation, private medical, schooling, communications, company car). Identify valuation methodology (employer cost vs. market value).
Statutory benefits employer cost	Employer social insurance contributions and any mandatory benefits costs included in total compensation view.
One-off payments	Hiring/retention bonuses, relocation, spot awards; flag as non-recurring to exclude from underlying pay equity base where appropriate.
Unpaid leaves and absences	Hours/days of unpaid leave to correctly annualize and FTE-normalize compensation; maternity/paternity leave flags (never used as a negative factor).
Performance ratings and achievements	Most recent and multi-year performance ratings; objective metrics for sales/production roles; used as legitimate controls.
Qualifications and certifications	Highest education level and job-relevant licenses/certifications; documentation source (HR file).
Tenure in role and time since last promotion	Months in current role; supports experience-related differentials.
Protected characteristics (sensitive)	Sex/gender (binary/non-binary as recorded), nationality; collect only where lawful and necessary, applying data minimization and confidentiality protocols. Avoid collecting sensitive data not strictly needed.
Union/collective agreement coverage	Coverage flag and agreement identifier; certain pay elements may be set by CBA.
Currency and FX rate used	Currency of payment; FX rate and source/date used for normalization where any elements are in foreign currency.
CPI index reference	CPI or inflation index and reference date used for time normalization in high-inflation settings.
Exclusion flags	Employees to exclude with reason codes (e.g., <90 days tenure, interns, contractors, unpaid leaves >50% of period, expatriates on non-comparable packages).

Step-by-Step Calculation Methodology

1. Data Standardization: Standardize all compensation elements to a common analysis period, currency, and valuation methodology to ensure comparability across employees and time.
   1. Timeframe normalization: select a 12‑month reference period (e.g., FY or calendar year). Prorate partial-year employees to annualized figures using actual days worked or paid periods.
   2. Currency normalization: convert all non-SYP elements to a single reporting currency (e.g., SYP or USD) using a documented FX policy. In Syria’s multiple-rate environment, select a consistent, auditable rate source and date (e.g., official central bank rate or a company treasury compliance rate) and apply uniformly. Disclose any dual-rate sensitivity.
   3. Inflation adjustment: where evaluating pay trajectories over multiple periods in a high-inflation context, index historical amounts to the reference date using Syrian CPI (Central Bureau of Statistics) or an internal inflation proxy. Document index sources and base month.
   4. Compensation taxonomy: map all pay components into standardized buckets: Base, Guaranteed Allowances, Premiums/Overtime, Variable Bonuses, Equity, In‑Kind Benefits, Statutory Employer Costs, One‑Off/Non‑Recurring.
   5. Valuation choices: value in-kind benefits at employer cost or fair market value consistently; value equity at grant-date fair value amortized over vesting for comparability; value sales commissions on earned basis aligned to the analysis period.
   6. Data quality controls: deduplicate records; reconcile HRIS vs. payroll totals; impute or exclude missing critical fields with a documented rule; winsorize extreme values (e.g., 1st/99th percentile) to reduce undue influence while retaining valid high earners.

1. FTE Adjustments: Normalize compensation to full-time equivalency to compare part-time and full-time workers on the same basis.
   1. Define full-time standard hours (e.g., contract or policy standard) and compute FTE = Actual Scheduled Weekly Hours / Full-Time Standard Hours, capped at 1.00.
   2. Annualized Base (FTE‑normalized) = Contracted Base Pay (per period) × Periods per Year ÷ FTE divisor when base is reduced for part-time; alternatively multiply part-time base by (1/FTE) to scale to full-time equivalent.
   3. Pro-rate guaranteed allowances by FTE unless the allowance is truly fixed and non-proportional (documented policy). Premiums linked to hours (overtime, shift differentials) remain on an actual-earned basis and are not FTE-normalized.
   4. Employees on extended unpaid leave are excluded if compensation is not representative (apply exclusion flags with reasons).

1. Total Compensation Calculations: Build comparable total compensation constructs for analysis while separating non-recurring items where needed.
   1. Define three nested measures:
   2. 1) Base Comparable Pay (BCP) = Annualized Base + FTE‑proportional Guaranteed Allowances.
   3. 2) Regular Cash Compensation (RCC) = BCP + Actual Premiums/Overtime + Shift Differentials + Recurring Variable Pay (e.g., sales commissions that are core to role).
   4. 3) Total Direct Compensation (TDC) = RCC + Annual/Discretionary Bonuses (accrued to period) + Equity Amortization Portion + Imputed Value of In‑Kind Benefits + Employer Statutory Costs (if policy includes).
   5. Equity amortization: for an award with grant-date fair value FV and vesting over N years, Annual Equity Value = FV / N; include only the portion attributable to the analysis year.
   6. One-off items (sign‑on, relocation, extraordinary retention) are either excluded from the analytic base or analyzed separately; maintain a flag for transparency.

1. Comparison Group Formation: Create statistically valid groups of comparable work to isolate pay differences not explained by job content or market.
   1. Primary hierarchy: Same Job Title + Grade/Band + Work Location (governorate/site) + Contract Type (permanent/fixed-term) + Overtime Eligibility. Use at least grade/band and family controls where titles are noisy.
   2. Secondary aggregation: Where groups are too small (e.g., N<15 or underpowered for testing), roll up to Job Family × Grade within the same location or cluster close locations with similar labor markets when justified.
   3. Exclusions: Apprentices/interns, employees with tenure under 90 days, independent contractors, and expatriates on non-comparable packages are excluded from core analyses and reported separately.
   4. Documentation: For each comparison group, maintain a profile (job scope, key tasks, required qualifications) to evidence “equal or comparable work” determinations.

1. Statistical Testing: Apply appropriate statistical methods to detect unexplained pay gaps, controlling for legitimate factors.
   1. Descriptive screens: Compute group-level mean and median gaps by sex (or other protected attribute as lawful) on BCP and TDC. Flag absolute gaps ≥ 5% for further testing.
   2. OLS regression (preferred for groups with N≥30 and sufficient covariate variation): log(TDC or BCP) as dependent variable; key independent variable = protected attribute (e.g., Female indicator); controls = tenure, time-in-role, grade, job family, performance rating, education/certifications, location, overtime eligibility, and fixed effects for job level; use robust or clustered standard errors at job family or grade.
   3. Significance thresholds: p<0.05 for primary flag; additionally report effect size (e.g., percentage gap from exponentiated coefficient) and 95% confidence interval. Apply multiple-testing control (e.g., Benjamini–Hochberg) across many groups to manage false discovery.
   4. Small samples (N<30): use non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney) for distributional differences and/or Bayesian hierarchical models pooling across similar groups; supplement with structured pay range position analysis (e.g., compa‑ratio vs. midpoint).
   5. Practical significance: prioritize remediation where gaps are both statistically significant and practically meaningful (e.g., ≥ 3–5% after controls), or where patterns recur across cohorts.

1. Gap Analysis: Interpret results, identify drivers, and define corrective actions with documented justification.
   1. Decompose gaps into explained vs. unexplained components via Oaxaca–Blinder or regression-based decomposition to quantify the contributions of tenure, performance, and job-related factors.
   2. Review pay range position (min/mid/max) by cohort to identify systemic placement differences (e.g., women clustered near minimum).
   3. Validate data artifacts (e.g., missing ratings skew) before deciding on remedies. Confirm no prohibited factors (pregnancy/marital status) were included in models or decisions.
   4. Produce a remediation register listing employees affected, required adjustments, rationale, expected budget impact, and effective dates. Secure approvals per internal governance and, where relevant, any collective bargaining protocols.

Justifiable Differences

• Legally and analytically acceptable factors (must be job-related, consistently applied, and evidenced in records)
  • Performance and productivity documented through calibrated ratings, objective KPIs, and achievement records over a defined multi-year window.
  • Experience and tenure including total relevant experience, time in role, and specialized industry expertise.
  • Education and qualifications where a degree, license, or certification is demonstrably required for the role or materially enhances job performance.
  • Job content and scope differences in responsibility, complexity, supervisory span, budget accountability, or specialized skill requirements.
  • Geographic differentials reflecting documented market pay differences between governorates/sites and hardship/hazard or site allowances that are uniformly applied.
  • Market scarcity and critical skills evidenced by external benchmarks, recruitment difficulty, or approved market premiums within policy.
  • Overtime and shift premiums arising from actual hours and legal/contractual multipliers; inherently variable and not comparable on an FTE basis.
  • Seniority within pay range based on time since last promotion, sustained contribution, and internal progression rules.
  • Collective bargaining outcomes where CBAs set specific rates/allowances applicable to defined bargaining units.

• Documentation and burden of proof
  • Maintain contemporaneous documentation: performance reviews, promotion minutes, job evaluation records, compensation committee approvals, and market pricing sources.
  • Ensure the factor is demonstrably applied across cohorts without bias and is proportional to the pay difference claimed.
  • In disputes, employers typically bear the burden to evidence lawful, job-related rationales for differences; undocumented “manager discretion” is insufficient.

• Non-justifiable or high-risk reasons
  • Sex/gender, pregnancy, maternity status, marital status, family status, or caregiver responsibilities.
  • Nationality or ethnicity alone (immigration status-related allowances must be policy-based and consistently applied).
  • Part-time status per se (comparisons must be on an FTE-adjusted basis).
  • Salary history from prior employment as a sole basis for setting pay; historical inequities are not a defense to current disparities.
  • Subjective manager preference without objective, documented criteria.
  • Disciplinary history not substantiated by due process and written records.

Reporting Requirements

• Government submissions
  • No statutory pay equity or gender pay gap reporting or publication obligations are currently mandated for private-sector employers in Syria.
  • Employers must furnish payroll and employment records upon request to MoSAL labor inspectors and courts in the context of inspections or disputes.

• Internal reporting and governance
  • Establish an annual internal pay equity review aligned to the budgeting cycle, with quarterly monitoring in high-inflation periods to prevent drift.
  • Provide periodic reports to executive leadership and the board (or a designated compensation committee), summarizing methodology, findings, remediation actions, and budget impact.
  • Where collective agreements apply, share aggregate, non-identifying findings and remedial frameworks with union representatives as required by the CBA.

• Employee disclosures
  • Provide itemized payslips detailing wage components, allowances, overtime, and deductions as required by the Labour Law and good practice.
  • Respond to individual employee requests for pay information consistent with internal transparency policy and privacy constraints; Syria has no mandated pay data disclosure template.

• Public disclosure
  • No public disclosure of pay gap metrics is mandated. Voluntary ESG reporting may include high-level pay equity metrics following corporate policy and sanctions-related communication guidelines.

Example Employee Statement

The following template balances transparency with privacy and complies with Syrian labor practices. Replace bracketed fields with the organization’s details.

Subject: Response to Request for Pay Information

Date: [DD MMM YYYY]

Employee: [Full Name], [Job Title], [Department]

Dear [Mr./Ms./Mx. Surname],

This statement provides information about how your compensation compares within the applicable pay range for your role and level at [Company Name] in [Location].

• Your current base salary is [SYP/other currency amount] per [month/year].

• The established pay range for your role and level in [Location] is [min] to [max], with a current midpoint of [midpoint]. Your position within the range is [compa-ratio or percentile] based on your base salary.

• In addition to base salary, you are eligible for the following recurring compensation elements: [list allowances, overtime eligibility, variable pay eligibility]. Actual payments for variable elements depend on performance outcomes and applicable policies.

• Pay decisions for your role consider job responsibilities, qualifications, experience, performance, and local market conditions. These factors are applied consistently to employees in comparable positions.

• [Company Name] conducts regular reviews of compensation to ensure fairness and alignment with our policies and applicable laws. If any adjustments are warranted, they are implemented through our standard compensation processes.

If you have questions about this information, please contact [HR/Total Rewards contact] or [Manager].

Sincerely,

[Authorized Signatory]

Remediation Framework

• Trigger and scoping
  • Identification of an unexplained pay gap via the annual review, ad-hoc analysis, or employee complaint triggers a formal remediation workflow led by Total Rewards with Legal/HR oversight.
  • Define scope: affected comparison groups, number of individuals, compensation elements involved (base vs. total cash), and budget impact.

• Root-cause assessment
  • Validate data integrity, modeling specifications, and policy adherence.
  • Examine structural drivers: hiring rates by cohort, range placement at entry, promotion velocity, performance distribution, and manager-specific patterns.

• Corrective measures
  • Base pay adjustments: Move affected employees to the appropriate point in range to eliminate the unexplained portion of the gap. Prioritize base adjustments over one-time payments to ensure durable equity.
  • One-time true-ups: Where retroactivity is appropriate, provide lump-sum payments to address past underpayment during the review period; document tax and social insurance treatment.
  • Structural fixes: Adjust hiring guidelines (offers relative to midpoint), promotion increase standards, and performance calibration to prevent reoccurrence.

• Timelines and approvals
  • Target effective date aligned to the next feasible payroll cycle; urgent cases can be off-cycle where systems permit.
  • Obtain approvals per compensation governance, including finance budget sign-off and legal review in sensitive cases.

• Documentation and communication
  • Update the remediation register with employee-level actions, rationale linked to legitimate factors, and evidence supporting decisions.
  • Communicate adjustments to affected employees using standardized language and without referencing protected characteristics.

• Monitoring and appeal
  • Track post-remediation metrics for two subsequent cycles to confirm gap closure and range integrity.
  • Provide an internal appeal channel for employees to request reconsideration; review by a panel separate from the initial decision-makers.

Compliance Calendar

• Annual cycle
  • Q1: Finalize methodology, FX/inflation assumptions, comparison groups, and governance calendar.
  • Q2: Extract and cleanse data; complete preliminary descriptive analyses; engage with HRBPs for validation.
  • Q3: Run statistical testing; finalize remediation plan; secure budget approvals.
  • Q4: Implement adjustments in payroll; update policies and hiring guidelines; produce year-end report for leadership.

• Quarterly checkpoints
  • Monitor hiring offers and range placements; spot-check for drift due to inflation or exchange-rate changes.
  • Review overtime and premium pay patterns for equity impacts in shift-heavy operations.

• Regulatory monitoring
  • Track government decrees adjusting minimum wage and allowances; recalibrate pay ranges as needed.
  • Monitor any MoSAL circulars on wage and record-keeping.

GDPR and Data Management

• Legal basis and scope in Syria remains primarily contractual and policy-driven, as there is no comprehensive, GDPR-equivalent national data protection statute. Organizations define clear internal policies specifying the purposes of processing employee data for compensation analysis, grounded in contract performance, legitimate interests, and compliance obligations.
• Data collection minimization applies: collect only those attributes necessary for the analysis (e.g., sex/gender for equal pay testing) and avoid excessive sensitive data. Where sensitive attributes are processed, apply heightened controls and document necessity and proportionality.
• Consent is generally not the preferred legal basis in employment contexts due to power imbalance; where used for optional analytics, consent must be informed, specific, and revocable without adverse consequences. Internal policies and notices should transparently describe analytics activities.
• Storage and retention practices specify secure storage within HRIS/compensation systems, role-based access controls, and defined retention periods (e.g., retain pay equity analysis outputs for a set number of years aligned with limitation periods for labor claims and internal audit requirements). Secure deletion or anonymization is applied at end of retention.
• Employee rights are honored through internal procedures allowing employees to access and correct their personal data, obtain information about processing, and raise concerns. Even absent a comprehensive statute, honoring such rights aligns with international best practice and reduces disputes.
• Cross-border transfers are governed by corporate policy, contractual safeguards, and applicable extraterritorial regimes. If an EU entity determines purposes/means of processing, GDPR may apply, requiring transfer tools (e.g., standard contractual clauses), transfer impact assessments, and appropriate technical and organizational measures. Sanctions and export controls are also considered when transferring data from or to Syria.
• Security measures include encryption at rest and in transit, strong authentication, logging and monitoring, segregation of duties, and periodic access reviews. Given conflict-related risk, continuity plans address system outages and data backup integrity, with offsite encrypted backups in compliant jurisdictions.
• Vendor management requires data processing agreements with analytics vendors and cloud providers, incorporating confidentiality, security standards, subprocessor controls, and audit rights. Vendors must be screened for sanctions compliance and data residency implications.
• Record-keeping encompasses data inventories, processing records for pay equity projects, risk assessments for sensitive processing, and documentation of modeling choices, FX/inflation assumptions, and exclusion criteria to evidence fairness and accountability.

Useful Resources

• Ministry of Social Affairs and Labour (MoSAL)
  • Main portal (Arabic): http://www.molsa.gov.sy/ (site availability may vary)
  • Labour inspectorate contact details and circulars are typically published or obtainable via the Ministry.
• Official Gazette / Syrian legal texts
  • Official publications of laws and decrees can be accessed through government portals or legal databases in Arabic; availability fluctuates.
• Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS)
  • http://www.cbssyr.sy/ for CPI and labor market indicators used for inflation adjustments and context.
• ILO NATLEX database – Syrian Arab Republic
  • https://www.ilo.org/dyn/natlex/ for consolidated references to Syrian labor legislation and regulations (English abstracts; Arabic texts where available).
• OHCHR Treaty Database – Syrian Arab Republic
  • https://tbinternet.ohchr.org/ for status of Syria’s participation in international human rights treaties relevant to non-discrimination and equal pay.
• No official pay equity reporting portal
  • Syria does not operate a portal for pay equity/gender pay reporting; employers maintain internal records and respond to MoSAL inspections as required.

Important Disclaimer: This guide is based on information available as of August 2025 and is subject to change. The content provided does not constitute legal advice and is for informational purposes only. Total Rewards professionals should seek qualified legal counsel and local employment law expertise before making decisions or taking actions based on this guidance. Laws and regulations vary by jurisdiction and can change frequently. Always consult with local legal experts and relevant government agencies for the most current requirements.